Orvyn operates as the independent intelligence layer between legal claims and institutional capital. We determine what is fundable, collectable, and investable — before capital is exposed. Six offices. 160+ jurisdictions. Former Burford Capital, Kirkland & Ellis, Omni Bridgeway, and Goldman Sachs.
The market routinely overweights legal merit and damages models while underweighting the operational reality of recovery, jurisdictional friction, and duration. Funders lose money not because the law was wrong — but because enforcement failed, the counterparty was judgment-proof, or the timeline destroyed the IRR.
Orvyn addresses that gap through disciplined validation, enforcement-led analysis, and dossier construction designed for Investment Committee scrutiny rather than promotional optimism.
Our proprietary five-pillar validation framework evaluates claims with particular emphasis on enforcement probability — the variable most often mispriced in litigation finance.
| Score | Descriptor | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Exceptional | Immediate IC priority |
| 4 | Strong | Standard IC track |
| 3 | Adequate | Extended due diligence |
| 2 | Marginal | Conditional only |
| 1 | Weak | Decline |
We assess asset visibility, jurisdictional infrastructure, sovereign immunity risk, counterparty solvency, recognition pathways under the New York Convention, and cross-border enforcement friction. This is the distinction between a theoretical win and a collectable outcome.
Enforcement Probability carries equal weight to Legal Merit — deliberately. Funders who have lost money in litigation finance lost it most frequently through enforcement failure, not legal merit failure.
This portal screens for seriousness, recoverability, and institutional fit. It is not a public contact form. Matters below threshold, without counsel, or lacking sufficient commercial basis may not be reviewed. Initial screening is free and without obligation.